Google’s Vince Update – Big Brands Benefit
Comments (12)
[...] theory is that non-brands need to invest more in content & social media which is quite true although [...]
How user data, links & document scoring may be used in the “brand” algorithm
[...] theory is that non-brands need to invest more in content & social media which is quite true although [...]
Google Vince Update hits the UK | SEO It
[...] give more examples of keywords that are effected and they seem to be broadly in the travel and finance. It is too [...]
William
We've been testing the Google servers for 12 months now ready for this change and i can say it has nothing to do with content.
Top comparison sites that add pages of content to their site on a daily basis have far more relevant content than the major brands.
There has been a change in the algorithms and favours the big brands with big off-line marketing budgets but smaller players can change their SEO focus to also benefit. They need to keep testing the Google servers to figure out how :)Paul
I think Google has lost it's way.
I thought the whole idea of search engines was to provide an even playing field?
Surely if i want to find a big brand I would just search for it.
example: if I wanted to visit coke cola Id search for coke cola? come on google play fair.Jonathan Stewart
I've got an interesting example of a brand doing far better than I think they should. British Airways currently rank 10th in Google UK for travel</a>.
"Travel" doesn't appear anywhere on the page, and isn't on the homepage title. I'm not taking anything away from whoever does their SEO, but from an SEO point of view, I just don't think Google should put them on the first page. From a users point of view though it makes complete sense.Jonathan Stewart
@Rob Seeing some awful SERPs as a result of poor geolocation at the moment too. Also seeing some big "brands" not performing as expected for some core terms. Not a big fan generally of the recent changes Google have made, especially Vince - big kick in the teeth for all the smaller sites who have worked so hard for great Google visibility, only to have it taken away. Interesting point you've made about PPC too.
richardbaxterseo
Nice write up Liz. Will be interesting to see how far past these generic terms the update rolls....
SEOKudos
Google’s Vince Update - Big Brands Benefit...
Kudos for a great SEO article - Trackback from SEOKudos...Bigmastiq
Interesting. However in the sector that I monitor - online payments and transfers, I see no big shake in page 1. The obvious winner before and still there now no matter if US or UK search - talking about paypal and WU. The only strange result I see is yahoo answers appearing for such money term like send money. At the moment Bing looks more relevant for sure.
RobBothan - Rob Nicholson
Vince, sounds like some second rate mafia heavy... which I suspect it is.
To sum up - yes they've reshuffled their results 2 times now in as many months - Geo-location, and now Vince. Neither has bought significant benefit to the user in my SERPs.
1st update stuck irrelevant technical sites in 1st page of serps. Fail.
Vince update, if your a big brand that doesnt do SEO, you still dont need to as Google teams decide that "your a big brand" - and their perspective isnt great.
If your a SME or smaller brand - your screwed.
Result? Google realised PPC wasnt delivering conversions etc and more inhouse marketers were pushing budget towards SEO (vodafone push a 70/30 PPC/SEO split) thus they've now made it essential to push money to PPC otherwise your traffic will die.....Gregory Lyons
Interesting times. The mighty moneysupermarket.com still holds either 1st or 2nd place positions for Car Insurance, Home Insurance, Life Insurance, Travel Insurance, Savings, ISAs, Loans, Current Accounts, Mortgages and many other big terms. Can anything topple this heavyweight??
Post a comment
Stay Connected
SUBSCRIBE
Sign up for email notifications of Connect blog posts.




Jason Butcher » How user data, links & document scoring may be used in the “brand” algorithm